|
Streaming Video
By Rita Stankeviciute
What
is streaming video?
The convergence of telecommunications and computer technologies
has become a springboard for video and audio production to plunge
deep into the waters of the internet. The new medium called streaming
video was unimaginable just ten years ago but now it is becoming
an every-day commodity for millions of the internet users. Streaming
video changed the world for the tech-savvy people and the predictions
are that every consumer’s information behavior is about
to change too.
Streaming video means that motion video together with audio is
delivered live to your personal computer over the internet. The
size of the memory of a computer does not play any role because
there is no need to download anything. Nearly every computer nowadays
can play videos and can be used to broadcast audio and video outward
in the internet, so streaming video is contingent only on the
connection speed.
The spread of broadband internet connections and the increase
in bandwidth contributed to the development of video online. Although
some streaming videos are still available with a narrowband connection,
out of 5 billion total video streams analyzed in 2004, 79.1% were
served at rates of 100 Kbps and above. [1]
It
is expected that by 2005 half of all homes online will be using
broadband connections. According to Broadband Viewer Metrics and
Market Analysis 2000 –2004 YTD, the latest published report
by AccuStream iMedia Research, “broadband users accessed
an average of 15.4 video streams per month during the first half
of 2004, up 42.6% over 2003 for sites with 90% broadband usage.”
[2]
These
numbers and the changing patterns of internet content show that
streaming video is becoming an extremely popular medium. Now one
does not have to worry about missing a TV program or a new music
video. More often broadcast television companies and cable TV
stations have the most resonant or exclusive materials on their
websites. Just type in the address, pick the player, choose the
speed and in less than a minute the desired video streams onto
your computer screen.
In this presentation other areas of the internet and wireless
technologies regarding streaming video will also be discussed.
How does this technology work? What technological, economical
and regulatory problems does it face? Where is streaming video
“streaming” to in the future?
The
Start of Streaming Video
The idea of streaming video over the internet was illusory just
ten years ago because the speed at which computers exchanged information
was not fast enough and the compression of digital information
was still it its development stages. In the middle of the 1990s
the reach of the internet was still small and the majority of
users had analog dial-up modems, which meant that downloads of
any kind of video would take too long. This notwithstanding, the
experts in the business truly believed in the future of this technology.
This excerpt of a magazine article in 1996 illustrates:
You, too, can instantly and reliably deliver quality audio and
video content to anyone in the world who clicks a media link
on your Web site! Sound too good to be true? Well, it's money
in the bank, provided you can be flexible when it comes to quality.
[3]
It
is believed that the turning point that made streaming video popular
was the war in Iraq. The surge in traffic was huge – on
the first day of the war RealNetworks issued 4.1 terabytes of
data. According to streaming-video providers, the conflict in
Iraq was “a watershed moment for streaming video and its
ability to progress online”. [4]
It was advances in information technologies, specifically networking
and digital file compression that enabled video to be transmitted
over the internet. The growth of broadband connections and use
of digital cameras made video streaming over the internet a reality
to many.
How
the technology works?
How does a video stream on a computer screen instantly after clicking
an icon and one does not have to worry about how much hard disk
space is available on the computer?
 |
| Figure
1: Webcasting diagram (www.contenta.com.) |
Figure
1 explains the concept of the technology.
The main concept of streaming video is buffering at the video
server and client side in order to store packet sequences locally
instead of downloading the entire video. Streaming video buffers
one to two seconds of packetized video at the client site; thus,
the user can start watching the video almost immediately with
only a small delay. This technique does not take up any hard disc
space and also allows real-time transmission events. [5]
An
important factor in the development of video streaming was the
development of compression techniques. Compressing data that is
being transferred over a network made it possible to effectively
increase the bandwidth available at any connection speed. [6]
Compression also reduced the storage volumes of multimedia content
and limited the bit rate necessary to transmit over the internet.
[7]
The
three most popular programs that allow the simultaneous transfer
of digital media received in a continuous and real time stream
are RealMedia Player, Apple QuickTime Player, and Microsoft Windows
Media Player. “Once you've installed a player, you can click
on a link and start watching a feed almost instantly. The problem,
as with audio, is that you will find video streams that work with
some players but not with others.” [8] So the best
solution is to have all of them, since they all are free and available
online (see Figure 2).
This
technology allows not only television stations but also “every
company, every local theater arts group and any kid with an interest
in video to mount their own Web-based television station. Forget
about the 500-channel universe… [it is] the 5 million-channel
universe.” [9]
Video streaming vs. Television
In our fast-paced information society people want to get their
news and entertainment anytime anywhere. Streaming video creates
wonderful opportunity for content providers to gain a wider audience.
Throughout the years not only has the number of video streams
increased significantly but also the number of viewers (see Table
1 and Table 2). Total video streams served rose 104% in 2003 to
7.87 billion. Accustream iMedia Research forecasts that streaming
video will continue to register double-digit growth gains. Table
2 shows how the viewing of the streaming videos in every content
category is growing every year.
Table
1. [10]
Table
2. [11]
Streaming
video streams served by content category: 1999-2005 |
| Millions
of views |
Film
|
1 |
2 |
2 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
0 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
1 |
4 |
719. |
978 |
1,21 |
1,39 |
9 |
1 |
3 |
8 |
9 |
1.2 |
2.8 |
. |
7 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Internet
TV |
1 |
9 |
2 |
333. |
428. |
503. |
551. |
4 |
0 |
9 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
2 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
News |
6 |
2 |
7 |
1,04 |
1,57 |
2,06 |
2,47 |
9 |
4 |
9 |
1.7 |
0.4 |
4.2 |
6.1 |
. |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
| General
Entertainment
|
1 |
1 |
2 |
411. |
580. |
695. |
765. |
9 |
4 |
5 |
8 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
. |
5 |
9 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
| Sports
|
7 |
1 |
3 |
469. |
599. |
707. |
753. |
5 |
8 |
3 |
4 |
7 |
5 |
4 |
. |
3 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
| Music
|
7 |
2 |
4 |
883. |
1.38 |
1.85 |
2,15 |
6 |
6 |
7 |
0 |
4.8 |
7.2 |
7.5 |
. |
9 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
. |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
0 |
|
|
|
|
Source:
Accustream iMedia Research
Does
the spectacular growth of this new technology threaten the future
of traditional TV networks?
Although
internet is taking on some of the functions of television, it
is hardly imaginable that a computer is going to replace the television
set anytime soon. Firstly, broadband digital television moves
ahead and now offers not just the traditional programming but
also all kinds of on demand and pay-per-view materials. The total
amount of information on television so far outnumbers video streams
available online. Secondly, TV viewing habits are entrenched into
the modern culture and as yet only some people are willing to
substitute their enormous TV screens for a computer screen. Finally,
internet is still “far from providing the required quality
of service for video streaming” [12] and so the
quality is often poor compared to the pictures on TV:
Web
users often feel frustrated by the small images, slow delivery,
missing frames, and poor audio sync that they experience when
browsing the current Internet and come across audio and video
clips they would like to view. These problems are exacerbated
when viewing live television on the Net; the pictures are coarse
and grainy and the motion jerky. [13]
Streaming
video has its struggles, however, it attracts audiences. One of
the reasons for that is that the internet is available during
working hours:
A
recent study by eMarketer and the Wall Street Journal Online
has determined that there are 50 million members of the Internet
"at-work audience." Unable to get to a television
to watch news, these folks may be turning to streaming video
because they have no other choice. And if the content they want
is only available for a fee, they're prepared to pay for it.
[14]
Although
people seldom sit back and relax at the computer, the ability
to access archives of information and shows, as well as original
content, is another reason for people to watch streaming videos.
Now,
the majority of television news websites provide streaming video
feeds from their original news programs, as well as excerpts of
many other television shows. For instance, you can watch segments
from NBC Nightly News and special reports on www.msnvideo.msn.com
or for $4.95 per month you can subscribe to ABCNews On Demand
(www.abcnews.com) and have
access to video news streams around the clock.
Some
companies also produce original streaming videos that draw subscribers’
attention. One of the first and most celebrated interactive attempts
was a real-time fashion show on apparel company Victoria’s
Secret website in 1999. The visitors were guided through the website
by supermodel Heidi Klum who walked onto the page, offering information
regarding the swimming suits visitors click on. [15]
As many as 1.5 million people tried to connect to the website
during the live show. [16]
Sports,
adult entertainment, music videos, movie trailers are also highly
in demand and fast growing content of streaming video that make
people tune in online. Some
of them are free (if you watch advertisement), some you have to
pay for. Nonetheless, streaming video is becoming a business and
has the potential for huge profit.
Economic
issues
The convergence of television, advertising and the internet is
a well-spring of new revenue. Television stations retransmit some
of their content for a fee or they get companies to advertise
on their websites that get more visitors because the streaming
videos are available online anywhere in the world.
Hollywood
and movie distribution companies benefit because internet cuts
shipping costs and “a new way of pay-per-view is possible
as streaming to the home begins to match the quality of traditional
media distribution. Old films that would have stayed in a vault
could be ordered on demand”. [17]
Sports
is one of the most sought after contents online. Many games are
broadcast on TV only in particular areas of the United States
or the world. In this case video streaming online becomes the
only way to access a game and fans are willing to pay to watch
low-quality action on their computer screens. An impressive example
of sports on demand over the internet is the revenues that Major
League Baseball (MLB) got in 2003 after offering live and archived
video services online:
First,
distribution deals worth a combined $49 million were announced
in March with Internet service providers AOL and MSN to stream
live games and highlights over the Web. Then, on April 1, the
league was set to announce deals with three cable operators
-- Comcast, Charter Communications, and Cablevision -- to provide
new high-speed data customers live Webcasts of more than 240
games a month. Fans can also access archived games for later
replay. … During the 2003 season, MLB.com's third year
in business, the site attracted 500,000 subscribers. Those services
contributed to MLB.com's $92 million in revenues last year,
up 77% from 2002. [18]
Websites
that broadcast audio and video over the internet attract a lot
of advertising. A study by Arbitron Inc. and Edison Media Research
“Internet and Multimedia 12: the Value of Internet Broadcast
Advertising” found that “with an estimated monthly
audience of 51 million people, internet broadcasting is an affluent
and compelling value for advertisers with half living in households
with an annual income of $50,000 or more”. [19]
Because of more advertisements, in 2004 more content moved out
from behind subscription services and it pushed usage numbers.
Regulatory issues
Streaming video is a promising business but still has to solve
many regulatory problems. Copyright laws are not suited for webcasters
that want to access the programming owned by others. They are
required to negotiate with each individual copyright holder before
retransmitting TV broadcast signals over the internet. Under U.S.
Copyright law, even broadcasters, who transmit their own original
programming that includes copyrighted sound recordings, should
pay extra royalty. [20]
Copyright and piracy issues are a longstanding problem in the
internet business. Users are not going to be able to go to www.nbc.com
and watch NBC’s program live until NBC is guaranteed that
the videos will not leak outside the United States. There was
a scandal in 2000 when a Canadian website iCraveTV started streaming
uninterruptedly 17 Canadian and U.S. broadcast TV stations online.
The founder of the website used those signals online without permission
and so TV stations, movie studios and sport leagues sued him.
Under Canadian law users did not need permission, however, a U.S.
judge ordered the company to shut down and iCraveTV.com lost the
battle:
The legal fight is one of the first signs of what is likely
to be an ongoing struggle between traditional programmers and
online companies as the Web increasingly becomes a video medium.
Many sites have already begun offering original programming
of their own--but the attraction of providing proven draws such
as sports games, news or network television shows is irresistible
[21]
“Public policy as well as corporate practice is very much
in flux when it comes to cyberspace law and regulation”.
[22] High-speed internet is still immature, so there
are still legal concerns.
WIDER APPLICATIONS
The ability to stream content directly to end-user personal computers
attracts attention from different organizations. Businesses and
public schools and universities are embracing video streaming
for education, training and communication.
Education
The Harvard Business School has been using streaming video for
almost ten years “to deliver case studies and learning materials
for its classes via a closed corporate intranet”. [23]
Now, class materials often can be found online. A number of websites
provide streaming videos for educators that are incorporated with
other materials for classes. Streaming is a convenient and a time
efficient way to support curricula with films and videos. In addition,
it can eliminate access problems and is cheaper. [24]
Yet,
the use of streaming video for educational purposes has not taken
hold mostly because of the prominent problems such as the lack
of broadband connections, high-resolution monitors in classrooms,
and computer literacy.
Corporate communication
Streaming video is being embraced by large corporations to communicate
throughout the world; smaller businesses use the new technology
for training and communication. “Research from the Yankee
Group indicated that more than one-third of companies with more
than 100 employees use streaming media for training and education,
and over one-quarter use streaming video for corporate marketing,
advertising, and branding programs”. [25]
For
many companies it is important that the streaming video be available
not just live but also archived, because it is not always possible
for workers to be at their desk at specific time. That is the
main advantage of this type of streaming video technology against
the live streaming over satellite and other broadcast platforms.
Mobile Streaming
Technological advances in wireless networks allowing for higher-speed
data connectivity has brought streaming multimedia to people’s
cell phones.
For a monthly fee a number of converted television programs are
directly broadcast to cellular phones capable of receiving and
displaying video. Although it is still costly and not widely used,
people in business believe in the future of mobile streaming.
According to Jeff Hallock, vice president of consumer marketing
for Sprint PCS, the phone is a “third screen”:
 |
Television
is the first screen, and the personal computer is the second.
We’ve got the opportunity to deliver an experience where
users can watch things happen on the third screen that combine
a lot of the functionality of the first two – and it’s
the only one that’s with you at all times. |
| Figure
3: Streaming video is moving to consumer electronic devices.
Sports content is among the services on a mobile telephone |
Telephone companies can benefit from the technology of streaming
video because the subscriber growth is evident. However, mobile
streaming has to mature to the point where it is not only affordable
but the quality is up to par with computers.
CONCLUSION
Recent advancements in the information technologies have allowed
for video programming to be streamed via the internet for live
or subsequent viewing. Video streaming is the process whereby
digital information is compressed then delivered in segments piece-by-piece,
but rapidly enough that the information streaming is continuous.
The growth of broadband internet connections in the United States
has made the continuous and real time webstream more readily available,
thus more and more subscribers enjoy the videos online. One of
the technological advantages of streaming video is that it does
not take up any computer disc space, so the technological requirements
to view the pictures are not hard to meet.
Throughout the years not only has the number of video streams
increased but also the number of viewers. People watch news, movies,
adult entertainment, music videos, TV programs or sport events
online.
Inevitably streaming video will create a competition between traditional
television networks and internet because people can watch the
provided clips anytime anywhere. Audiences are attracted to the
provided archives of information and shows, especially the materials
that are not available anywhere else but online. Some might say
that no one would exchange a big TV screen for a small window
on the computer but the new generation prefers the computer and
for the others there is a new technology available – Web
TV which means that the internet content can be streamed onto
the television screen.
Streaming
video is becoming a profitable business. Television companies
offer access to video streams for a fee, advertisers are willing
to pay more for advertising online because of the growing audiences,
internet cuts costs for movie distributors. Video streaming is
also embraced by businesses and schools for education, communication
or training.
Streaming video is a promising business but it still has to solve
many regulatory problems. Cyberspace laws are a subject of change
as new technologies and services come around and shape the face
of the internet.
The videos stream not only into computer screens but also on mobile
phones. Major mobile market leaders offer services that bring
video to cellular phones anytime, anywhere with new technological
developments wireless networks can support higher-speed data connectivity.
There is still a lot of work to be done to improve the quality
of the wireless streaming video. Nevertheless, video streaming
is a dramatically growing new technology that is contributing
to the information society because it makes desirable information
in video format available anytime anywhere.
References:
1.
“Accustream Report: User Consumption of Broadband Video
Streams up 42% in first half ’04”, Accustream iMedia
Research, August 17, 2004. Retrieved November 1 from http://www.accustreamresearch.com/news/aug17-04.html.
2. “Accustream Research Releases its Streaming Media Forecasts
through 2005, ’03 Video Streams to grow by 40+%”,
Accustream iMedia Research. Retrieved November 1 from http://www.accustreamresearch.com/news/apr24-03.html
3. Adams, Hollenbeck, Sterthaus, Jones, “Streaming Video:
Fine-Tuning an Emerging Technology”, 2002. Retrieved November
1 from http://www.qdpi.com/Streaming%20video.pdf.
4. Borland, J, “Internet-based television company iCraveTV.com
lost a key legal battle today, as a U.S. judge ordered the company
to pull its TV services offline”, CNET News.com, January
28, 2000. Retrieved November 2, 2004 from http://news.com.com/2100-1033-236255.html?legacy=cnet.
5. Brown, Laura Jeanette, “Streaming Media: Video on Demand”,
MultiMedia & Internet@Schools, May/June 2004.
6. Covell, Andy, “Streaming Audio and Video in the Internet”,
Network Computing, August 15, 1996.
7. Duvall, Mel, Haar, Steven Vonder, “iCraveTV’s William
Craig: Robin Hood of Streaming Video?”, Inter@ctive Week,
February 2, 2000.
8. Engebretson, Joan, “Video Streaming Gets Ready to Deliver”,
America’s Network, July 15, 2004.
9. Flournoy Don, “The Broadband Millennium:Communication
Technologies and Markets”, 2004.
10. Grant, August E., Meadows, Jennifer H., eds. “Communication
Technology Update”, 9th edition, 2004.
11. Ha Ju-Yong, Dick, Steven J., Seung Kwan Ryu, “Broadcast
via the Internet: Technology, Market, and the Future”, Trends
in Communication, 2003.
12. Kantarci, Aylin, Ozbek, Nukhet, Tunali, Turhan, “Rate
adaptive video streaming under lossy network conditions”,
Signal Processing: Image Communication, July, 2004.
13. Keyes, J, Webcasting: How to broadcast to your customers over
the Net, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997.
14. Lowry, Tom, “Take me out to the Webcast”, Business
Week, April 12, 2004.
15. Mearian, Lucas, “Citigroup to Support Video Streaming
on 300k PCs”, Computerworld, June 7, 2004.
16. Metz, Cade, “Streaming Video”, PC Magazine, September
21, 2004.
17. Peek, Robin, “Streaming Video Comes of Age”, Information
Today, May 2003.
18. “Streaming Media 2003: Brand, User and Audience Share
Analysis”, Accustream iMedia Research. Retrieved November
1 from http://www.accustreamresearch.com/products/streamingmedia2003.html.
19. “The Internet Broadcast Audience Is an Affluent and
Compelling Value for Advertisers According to Arbitron/Edison
Media Research”, International Webcasting Association, March
24, 2004. Retrieved November 3 from http://www.webcasters.org/news/20040324.htm.
20. Whitney, Daisy, “Streaming Video”, Electronic
Media, June 26, 2000.
21. Wilkinson, Jeffrey, “Streaming Media”, “Communication
Technology Update”, ed. Grant, August E., Meadows, Jennifer
H., 9th edition, 2004.
22. Zimmerman, Christine, “Victoria’s Secret Exposes
Interactive Streaming Video, InternetWeek, February 19, 2001.

|